Order via email and use code XM888888 to enjoy 15% off your purchase

E-commerce Case Study: RidgeFulfill Reworks Corrugated Boxes with Flexographic Printing

"We thought the box was the simple part," admits Maya Singh, Head of Sustainability at RidgeFulfill. "But when volumes hit peak season, every decision—from ink to adhesive—has ripple effects on waste, CO₂, and cost per pack." Early on, the team explored supplier consolidation and standardization, including **uline boxes** for consistency across regions.

I spoke with Maya over coffee at their Amsterdam hub. The old approach—multiple corrugated specs, mixed ink systems, different tape grades—wasn’t breaking anything, but it made performance volatile. Flexographic Printing came into focus for brand marks on Corrugated Board, with Water-based Ink for compliance and fewer headaches on large runs.

Here’s where it gets interesting: their procurement team wanted tighter cost control while Maya’s group pushed FSC, recycled content, and low-migration ink. The turning point came when they quantified CO₂/pack, setup times, and scrap by SKU rather than by supplier. That reframe changed the conversation.

Company Overview and History

RidgeFulfill started in 2014 as a regional e-commerce fulfillment partner and now ships across the EU and North America. A typical day sees 12–15k shippers leaving a single site, mostly Corrugated Board with simple brand marks applied via Flexographic Printing and occasional Digital Printing for short-run seasonal campaigns. Picture a warehouse aisle and a tidy **stack of moving boxes** waiting for pick-and-pack—mundane, but every choice inside those stacks matters.

The company’s early packaging program leaned on mixed substrates—standard Kraft Paper skins for inner wraps, CCNB for a couple of retail-ready cases, and multiple tape SKUs. Nothing dramatic, but process variability crept in: different water content in liners, inconsistent die-cut tolerances, and ink systems that behaved differently in winter versus summer. Their print group kept FPY hovering around 82–86%, depending on line and substrate.

They didn’t chase perfection. They chased control. A uniform corrugated spec, FSC sourcing, and Water-based Ink for long runs helped. For higher-touch brand moments, Spot color via Flexographic Printing on exterior panels carried most of the load, while Varnishing stayed minimal to keep recycling streams clean.

Sustainability Goals

Q: Customers keep asking **where to get cheap moving boxes** without junking sustainability. Maya’s answer lands somewhere between procurement reality and environmental sincerity: standardize first, then negotiate. "You don’t need every SKU under the sun," she said. For bulk and replenishment, they trialed **uline cardboard boxes** as a consistent baseline and tested **uline gaylord boxes** for high-volume inbound flows where pallet cubes mattered.

The brand partnered with uline boxes to align board grades and flute profiles for regional hubs. On the printing side, they codified Water-based Ink with low-migration profiles against EU 1935/2004 guidance. For adhesives, they revisited **packing tape for moving boxes**—selecting a single acrylic formulation that kept fiber tear consistent on recycled content boards. "Not glamorous, but tape failure is the kind of tiny drama that shows up as real waste," Maya noted.

Trade-offs cropped up. Recycled content in liners rose to 60–70%, which nudged strength specs and forced tighter die-cut windows. Payback wasn’t immediate; they anticipated 18–24 months due to tooling changes and training. "I won’t pretend it’s cost-neutral on day one," Maya said. "But our CO₂/pack moved in the right direction, and scrap stopped swinging wildly between weeks."

Quantitative Results and Metrics

Let me back up for a moment and set the baseline. Before consolidation, waste hovered around 7–9%, driven by tape tear, panel scuffing, and print defects. After the program, scrap settled closer to 5–6%. FPY on the main flexo line moved from roughly 82% to around 90–92% when Corrugated Board spec and ink recipes were locked. Changeover Time came down from ~30 minutes to ~18–22 minutes with standard plates and cleaner ink handoffs.

On sustainability, their kWh/pack dropped in the 5–8% range thanks to fewer restarts and tighter workflow. CO₂/pack landed in a 10–15% reduction band—mostly from less scrap and a steadier recycled-content stream. None of this is magic; it’s steady process control and fewer surprises. They aligned with FSC and SGP frameworks, and maintained food-contact awareness where needed, though most e-commerce shippers sit outside strict food packaging constraints.

ROI questions always show up. Their Payback Period modeled at 18–24 months, sensitive to seasonal volumes and training cadence. "It wasn’t painless," Maya admitted. "We had a hiccup with plate wear in Q3, and our acrylic tape didn’t love one batch of liners, so we tuned adhesive and storage humidity." For teams asking the same question, the answer isn’t only about **uline boxes**; it’s about fit-for-purpose, responsibly sourced corrugated and a print workflow that behaves the same on Monday as it does on Friday.

Leave a Reply